Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S. -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Supreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S.
SafeX Pro Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 12:11:38
The Supreme Court put on hold the linchpin of President Obama’s climate policy, barring the Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday from carrying out the administration’s new Clean Power Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from electric power plants.
It was a surprising decision of staggering proportions, with repercussions that go far beyond the U.S. electrical grid, threatening the credibility of the Paris Agreement on climate change reached by the world’s nations in December.
The Clean Power Plan, designed to reduce by nearly a third emissions from fossil fuel-burning electricity plants, is the central element of the pledge by the United States to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 percent by 2025.
It was an unusual intervention by the Supreme Court, given that a powerful appeals court had just weeks ago turned down a request by dozens of states and their allies in the fossil fuel industries to impose a stay on the new federal regulation.
By blocking enforcement of the rule, the justices sent a signal that conservatives on the court may be inclined to limit the agency’s powers under the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court found in its 2007 decision Massachusetts v. EPA that the statute allows controls on carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming.
It would have taken years for the Clean Power Plan to take full effect, but the first step would have been for states to file implementation plans starting in September. Planning was well under way for that. About half the states had joined in appealing the rule, and some of them had declared that they would have refused to file state plans. Now, none of them will have to meet the rule’s deadlines, which the EPA will be powerless to enforce.
SCOTUSblog, an authoritative web site covering the Supreme Court, said that the order “will delay all parts of the plan, including all deadlines that would stretch on into 2030, until after the D.C. Circuit completes its review and the Supreme Court has finished, if the case does wind up there. There appears to be little chance for those two stages of review to be over by the time President Obama’s term ends next January 20.”
Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said “we remain confident that we will prevail on the merits.” He said the EPA would continue working with those states that want to move ahead with pollution controls under the rule.
“I am extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision,” said Attorney General Kamala Harris of California, one of 17 states that argued in favor of the rule in the appeals court. “The Court’s decision, and the special interests working to undermine this plan, threatens our environment, public health and economy.”
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey, whose state is the lead plaintiff challenging the rule, said “we are thrilled” by the “great victory.”
But environmental advocacy groups said they were confident that the rule would eventually pass judicial muster, and that in the meantime the trend toward greener power would continue.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has scheduled arguments for June and is expected to rule by late summer or early fall. An appeal to the Supreme Court would most likely be decided next year, after President Obama is out of office.
“We are confident the courts will ultimately uphold the Clean Power Plan on its merits,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The electricity sector has embarked on an unstoppable shift from its high-pollution, dirty-fueled past to a safer, cleaner-powered future, and the stay cannot reverse that trend.”
veryGood! (4731)
Related
- Trump's 'stop
- 'These girls can be pioneers': Why flag football is becoming so popular with kids
- More than $1 million in stolen dinosaur bones shipped to China, Justice officials say
- Dwayne Johnson Slams Paris Wax Figure for Missing Important Details
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Saints quarterback Derek Carr's outbursts shows double standard for Black players
- Bijan Robinson reveals headache was reason he barely played in Falcons' win
- Rebecca Loos Slams David Beckham For Portraying Himself as the Victim After Alleged Affair
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Israeli boy marks 9th birthday in Hamas captivity as family faces agonizing wait
Ranking
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Taylor Swift's 'Eras' wins box office as 'Killers of the Flower Moon' makes $23M debut
- Andy Reid after Travis Kelce's big day: Taylor Swift 'can stay around all she wants'
- DeSantis PAC attack ad hits Nikki Haley on China, as 2024 presidential rivalry grows
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- DHS warns of spike in hate crimes as Israel-Hamas war intensifies
- Indonesia top court rejects presidential age limit, clearing legal path for 72-year-old frontrunner
- Chevron buys Hess for $53 billion, 2nd buyout among major producers this month as oil prices surge
Recommendation
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
In 'I Must Be Dreaming,' Roz Chast succeeds in engaging us with her dreams
Dwayne Johnson Slams Paris Wax Figure for Missing Important Details
Ecuador's drug lords are building narco-zoos as status symbols. The animals are paying the price.
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Pentagon rushes defenses and advisers to Middle East as Israel’s ground assault in Gaza looms
Imprisoned Kremlin foe Navalny refuses to leave his cell and skips a court hearing as a protest
Five Decades and a Mountain of Evidence: Study Explores How Toxic Chemicals are ‘Stealing Children’s Future Potential’