Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-11 12:36:30
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (57529)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- New Mexico ethics board issues advisory opinion after AG’s office high payment to outside lawyers
- Teacher, assistant principal charged in paddling of elementary school student
- China’s Xi is courting Indo-Pacific leaders in a flurry of talks at a summit in San Francisco
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Families of 5 Minnesota men killed by police sue agency to force release of investigation files
- This year, Mama Stamberg's relish shares the table with cranberry chutney
- 2025 Toyota Camry: The car is going hybrid for the first time. What will be different?
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- 81 arrested as APEC summit protest shuts down the Bay Bridge in San Francisco
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Raise a Glass to This Heartwarming Modern Family Reunion
- US and Philippines sign a nuclear cooperation pact allowing US investment and technologies
- Climate change in Texas science textbooks causes divisions on state’s education board
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Live updates | With communications down, UNRWA warns there will be no aid deliveries across Rafah
- Trial of ex-officer Brett Hankison in Breonna Taylor death ends with hung jury: What's next
- Hungary qualifies for Euro 2024 with own-goal in stoppage time in match marred by violence
Recommendation
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
Federal charges added for Georgia jail escapee and woman accused of helping him
USMNT scores three second-half goals to win in its Concacaf Nations League opener
Serena Williams and Ruby Bridges to be inducted into National Women’s Hall of Fame
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Syria’s president grants amnesty, reduced sentences on anniversary of coup that put father in power
Police rescue children, patients after armed gang surrounds hospital in Haiti
Is your $2 bill worth $2,400 or more? Probably not, but here are some things to check.