Current:Home > reviewsHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -Trailblazer Capital Learning
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-13 21:04:09
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Michigan investigation began after outside firm brought alleged evidence to NCAA, per report
- Victim's sister asks Texas not to execute her brother's killer
- 2 Minnesota men accidentally shot by inexperienced hunters in separate incidents
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- 'American Horror Stories': Release date, cast, trailer, how to watch 'AHS' spinoff series
- Grandpa Google? Tech giant begins antitrust defense by poking fun at its status among youth
- Taliban free Afghan activist arrested 7 months ago after campaigning for girls’ education
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Judge dismisses Birmingham-Southern lawsuit against Alabama state treasurer over loan denial
Ranking
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Ex-NBA star Dwight Howard denies sexual assault allegation, calls activity 'consensual'
- Many in Niger are suffering under coup-related sanctions. Junta backers call it a worthy sacrifice
- Teenager charged in deadly 2022 school shooting in Iowa seeks to withdraw guilty plea
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- White House wants more than $23 billion from Congress to respond to natural disasters
- US not ruling out retaliation against Iran-backed groups after attacks on soldiers
- Strong US economic growth for last quarter likely reflected consumers’ resistance to Fed rate hikes
Recommendation
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Weekly applications for US jobless benefits tick up slightly
South Korea, US and Japan condemn North Korea’s alleged supply of munitions to Russia
Bud Light becomes the official beer of UFC as Anheuser-Busch looks to recoup revenue drop
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Real Housewives of Beverly Hills' Dorit Kemsley Breaks Silence on PK Divorce Rumors
NFL trade deadline targets: 23 players who could be on block
Why TikToker Alix Earle Says She Got “Face Transplant” in Her Sleep