Current:Home > FinanceThe Supreme Court rules against USPS in Sunday work case -Trailblazer Capital Learning
The Supreme Court rules against USPS in Sunday work case
View
Date:2025-04-16 05:16:53
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously handed a major victory to religious groups by greatly expanding how far employers must go to accommodate the religious views of their employees.
The court ruled in favor of Gerald Groff, an evangelical Christian postal worker, who refused to work on Sundays for religious reasons and said the U.S. Postal Service should accommodate his religious belief. He sued USPS for religious discrimination when he got in trouble for refusing to work Sunday shifts.
The case now returns to the lower courts.
The justices clarified law that made it illegal for employers to discriminate based on religion, requiring that they accommodate the religious beliefs of workers as long as the accommodation does not impose an "undue hardship on the employer's business." The court had previously defined the statutory term "undue hardship" by saying that employers should not have to bear more than what the court called a "de minimis," or trifling, cost.
That "de minimis" language has sparked a lot of criticism over the years. But Congress has repeatedly rejected proposals to provide greater accommodations for religious observers, including those who object to working on the Sabbath.
On Thursday, writing for the court, Justice Samuel Alito said the hardship must be more than minimal.
Courts "should resolve whether a hardship would be substantial in the context of an employer's business in the commonsense manner that it would use in applying any such test," he wrote.
Thursday's decision is yet another example of the court's increasing inclination to favor religiously observant groups, whether those groups are religious employers or religious employees.
For instance, the court has repeatedly sided with religious schools to be exempt from employment discrimination laws as applied to lay teachers. And in 2014, the conservative court ruled for the first time that a for-profit company could be exempt from a generally applicable federal law. Specifically, it ruled that Hobby Lobby, a closely held corporation employing some 13,000 employees, did not have to comply with a federal law that required employer-funded health plans to include coverage for contraceptive devices.
veryGood! (231)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Lily Allen Responds to Backlash After Giving Up Puppy for Eating Her Passport
- Channing Tatum Reveals Jaw-Dropping Way He Avoided Doing Laundry for a Year
- Lowe's changes DEI policies in another win for conservative activist
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Yes, SPF for Pets Is a Thing: 15 Must-Have Sun Protection Picks for Dogs, Including Sprays, Shirts & More
- RealPage lawyer denies collusion with landlords to raise rents, 'open to solutions' to resolve DOJ lawsuit
- How many points did Caitlin Clark score today? Rookie overcomes injury scare in victory
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- 2 small planes crash in Nebraska less than half an hour apart and kill at least 1 person
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- US Postal Service is abandoning a plan to reroute Reno-area mail processing to Sacramento
- Noel and Liam Gallagher announce Oasis tour after spat, 15-year hiatus
- 1000-Lb. Sisters' Tammy Slaton Claps Back on Reason She Shares So Many Selfies Amid Weight Loss
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Turn Up the Heat
- Connor Stalions Netflix documentary: Release date, how to watch 'Sign Stealer'
- US Open Day 1: What you missed as 2024's final Grand Slam begins
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
Man dies on river trip at Grand Canyon; 5th fatality in less than a month
Missouri abortion-rights amendment faces last-minute legal challenges
Chick-fil-A's latest menu additions are here: Banana Pudding Milkshake, spicy sandwich
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Can you actually get pregnant during your period? What an OB/GYN needs you to know.
Channing Tatum Reveals Jaw-Dropping Way He Avoided Doing Laundry for a Year
Karen Read now faces civil suit as well as murder charge in police officer boyfriend’s death